Meetedgar Vs Buffer
What To Choose in 2024?
What is Meetedgar?
MeetEdgar, launched in 2014, takes a different approach by automating the resharing of evergreen content. What I love most about MeetEdgar is how it saves time by automatically recycling posts, so your social media accounts stay active without extra effort on your part.
Best Suited For
MeetEdgar is ideal for businesses or individuals with a lot of evergreen content that needs to be reshared regularly. If you have a blog or other valuable assets that don’t lose relevance over time, MeetEdgar helps maintain a consistent social media presence without the hassle of constantly creating new posts.
What is Buffer?
Buffer was founded in 2010 with the mission to make social media management easy, transparent, and efficient. From my personal experience, Buffer is a breath of fresh air when it comes to managing multiple social media accounts. It allows me to schedule posts, track performance, and analyze results—all from one clean, simple interface. The best part? Its flexibility. I find Buffer to be intuitive, making it a go-to for solo entrepreneurs and small businesses.
Best Suited For
Buffer works best for businesses or individuals who want a no-fuss, straightforward tool to manage social media. If you value simplicity and need a tool that doesn’t overwhelm you with unnecessary features, Buffer is perfect. It’s especially great for small teams or entrepreneurs who want to handle scheduling, engagement, and analytics without a steep learning curve.
Overview
This page offers an unbiased comparison between Buffer and MeetEdgar, two of the most popular social media management platforms. While both have their strengths, they cater to different needs and workflows. By diving into their features, pricing, and performance, this comparison will help you make a more informed decision.
Having used both tools in my own social media management for businesses of varying sizes, I can speak from personal experience about how these platforms impact day-to-day tasks. Whether you’re a content creator managing your own brand or a business handling multiple accounts, this guide will give you valuable insights into which tool could be the game-changer you need to elevate your social media strategy.
Meetedgar vs Buffer: User Rating
To give you an objective view, let’s explore how MeetEdgar and Buffer are rated by users on reputable platforms like G2 and Capterra.
| Rating Categories | Meetedgar | Buffer |
| Star Rating (Out of 5) | 4.4 | 4.5 |
| Meets Requirements (Out of 10) | 8.7 | 8.9 |
| Ease of Use (Out of 10) | 8.8 | 9.1 |
| Ease of Setup (Out of 10) | 8.9 | 9.2 |
| Ease of Admin (Out of 10) | 8.6 | 8.8 |
| Quality of Support (Out of 10) | 8.5 | 8.7 |
| Business Partnership (Out of 10) | 8.3 | 8.5 |
| Product Direction (% positive) | 8.6 | 8.7 |
MeetEdgar is highly praised for its content recycling and automation features, making it ideal for businesses that have a lot of evergreen content and need a hands-off approach to social media management.
Buffer, on the other hand, stands out for its user-friendly interface, detailed analytics, and affordable pricing. It’s well-loved for straightforward scheduling and tracking across multiple social platforms.
Meetedgar vs Buffer: Feature Comparison
| Features | Meetedgar | Buffer |
| Pricing (per month in USD) | 19$ | 15$ |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms Supported | Major Platforms | Most Platforms |
| Bulk Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| RSS feeds | Yes | Yes |
| Content Recycling | Yes | No |
| Social Inbox | No | Yes |
| Advanced Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| Approval Workflow | No | Yes |
| URL Shortener | Yes | Yes |
| Team Management | No | Yes |
| Note on Pricing | Affordable with content recycling | Great value for essential features |
Scheduling and Automation
Both Buffer and MeetEdgar offer scheduling and automation features, but they serve slightly different needs.
Buffer has a clean and straightforward scheduling system, allowing you to queue content for multiple platforms and adjust post times for each network. This makes it super easy to plan ahead, and the ability to manually adjust scheduled posts is a big plus. From personal experience, Buffer’s quick scheduling feature allows me to plan posts a week in advance with just a few clicks.
MeetEdgar introduces a unique feature: content recycling. After you create a content library (e.g., blog posts or evergreen tips), MeetEdgar automatically reshuffles and reposts your content. This ensures that your social media remains active without you having to lift a finger. This feature is especially useful for clients with abundant evergreen content that they want to keep circulating without constantly creating fresh posts.
Supported Social Media Platforms
Both tools support a variety of social media platforms, but there are key differences.
Buffer supports Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, and Pinterest. For many businesses, this covers all the essential platforms. I personally find Buffer’s support for Instagram and Twitter particularly helpful since these platforms often see the highest engagement.
MeetEdgar supports Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Instagram, but it lacks Pinterest support. For clients who focus on Pinterest as a key platform, this can be limiting. However, for those primarily active on Facebook and Instagram, MeetEdgar performs exceptionally well—especially with its content recycling capabilities.
Analytics and Reporting
Buffer provides detailed analytics for each post, tracking engagement metrics like likes, shares, comments, and overall reach. The reporting system is user-friendly and offers actionable insights, which I find valuable for tracking the performance of scheduled posts. It’s easy to spot what’s working and adjust strategies accordingly.
MeetEdgar offers basic analytics that provide an overview of content performance, but they aren’t as detailed or customizable as Buffer’s. If you’re running multiple campaigns and need deep insights across platforms, Buffer tends to be the more comprehensive tool. However, MeetEdgar’s analytics should be sufficient for businesses focused mainly on recycling evergreen content.
User Interface and Experience
Buffer is known for its clean, minimalist design. The interface is intuitive, with most features accessible within a few clicks. The experience is seamless, making it perfect for users who don’t want to waste time navigating complex dashboards. I appreciate how easily I can switch between social media accounts and perform actions quickly, without confusion.
MeetEdgar has a unique design, especially in its content library and automation settings. It takes a little more time to set up, especially when configuring the content recycling system for the first time. However, once you’re up and running, it’s a smooth experience. Personally, I think MeetEdgar is great for those who prefer a more hands-off approach to social media management.
Pricing Comparison
Buffer offers a clear and affordable pricing structure, starting with a free plan that allows users to manage up to three social accounts and schedule up to 10 posts per account. This plan is a great starting point for solo entrepreneurs or small businesses.
For more features, Buffer’s Essentials Plan provides excellent value at an affordable price. I’ve personally used this plan for small business clients, and it covers scheduling, analytics, and team collaboration. As a business grows, the Team Plan is a great choice for scaling operations, particularly with its multi-user support. For larger teams, the Agency Plan offers the flexibility needed to manage a high volume of accounts.
MeetEdgar Pricing
MeetEdgar’s pricing is slightly higher, but it justifies the cost with its automation and content recycling features. The Free Plan is very limited, offering just one social account and three content categories. However, it provides a good introduction for small businesses or content creators testing out automation.
The Essentials Plan at $19/month is perfect for those who want to start automating content resharing. I’ve used this plan for small businesses with limited content and found it works well for automating posts without managing too many accounts. For more complex needs, the Team Plan at $49/month supports multiple accounts and fully automates content recycling. For businesses with a strong evergreen content library, this plan offers great value.
Pros and Cons of Using Meetedgar
Pros
-
- Content Recycling: Automates resharing of evergreen content.
-
- Simplified Management: Set-and-forget automation with content categories.
-
- Good for Evergreen Content: Keeps content fresh without new posts.
Cons
-
- Limited Platform Support: No Pinterest, fewer options.
-
- Higher Pricing for Small Businesses: Expensive for single-account users.
-
- Basic Analytics: Less detailed than Buffer’s insights.
Pros and Cons of Using Buffer
Pros
-
- User-friendly Interface: Great for beginners.
-
- Affordable Pricing Plans: Excellent value for small businesses.
-
- Comprehensive Analytics: Detailed insights into post performance.
-
- Wide Platform Support: Covers major social networks like Facebook and Instagram.
Cons
-
- Limited Automation: Lacks content recycling features.
-
- No Advanced Reporting in Lower Tiers: Basic analytics in entry-level plans.
-
- Expensive for Multiple Accounts: Costs increase with more accounts.
Conclusion of MeetEdgar Vs Buffer Comparison
Choosing between Buffer and MeetEdgar depends largely on your business needs. If you need a tool that’s easy to use, offers detailed analytics, and supports multiple platforms, Buffer might be the best fit. On the other hand, if your focus is automating content resharing and you have a library of evergreen content, MeetEdgar could save you time and effort. Consider your priorities—whether it’s flexibility, automation, or cost—and select the tool that aligns best with your social media strategy.
If you’re exploring social media management tools, RecurPost is another powerful alternative to consider. It offers a unique blend of features that focus on automating content posting, just like MeetEdgar, but with a few added benefits that may better suit your business needs. Whether you’re managing multiple social media accounts or looking to streamline your content strategy, RecurPost provides a reliable solution to save time and enhance your social media presence. Let’s explore how RecurPost compares with Buffer and MeetEdgar, and why it might be the right fit for your business.
RecurPost Vs. Meetedgar Vs. Buffer
| Feature | RecurPost | Meetedgar | Buffer |
| Pricing (per month in USD) | $25 | $19 (Lite Plan) | $15 (Pro Plan) |
| Free Trial | Yes | No (But 7-day money-back guarantee) | 14 days |
| Bulk Scheduling | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| AI Content Generation | Yes | No | No |
| Advanced Analytics | Yes | Yes | Yes (with the Premium plan) |
| Team Management | Yes | Yes | Yes (with the Premium plan) |
| Platform Support | Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest, Google Business Profile, YouTube, TikTok | Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn | Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, Pinterest |
| Caption Customization | Yes | Yes | Yes |
| URL Shortener | Yes | Yes (with Bitly integration) | Yes (with Buffer’s own link shortener) |
| White Label Reports | Yes | No | No |
| Content Categorization | Yes | Yes | No |
| Evergreen Content Recycling | Yes | Yes | No |
How RecurPost Addresses Common Pain Points: MeetEdgar vs Buffer
Pain Point Analysis:
- Limited Content Recycling:
- Both MeetEdgar and Buffer have certain limitations when it comes to content recycling. MeetEdgar offers automation for resharing evergreen content, but Buffer lacks this feature entirely. As a result, businesses often need to create new posts or re-upload old ones to keep their social media presence active.
- No Centralized Content Library:
- Neither MeetEdgar nor Buffer provides a comprehensive content library for storing and organizing posts, media, and hashtags. Without a content library, businesses may find it difficult to keep content organized, leading to inefficiencies when it comes time to reuse assets.
- Limited Analytics in Basic Plans:
- Both tools provide basic analytics, but more advanced reporting features are available only in higher-tier plans. This can be frustrating for smaller businesses or solo entrepreneurs who need detailed insights but don’t want to upgrade to a premium plan.
Why RecurPost Is Better Than Meetedgar and Buffer?
When considering social media management solutions, it is important to note that MeetEdgar and Buffer are both notable options, each offering distinct advantages. Nevertheless, when considering the range of features, ease of use, and cost-effectiveness, RecurPost emerges as a standout option. RecurPost has a wide range of features that can be customized to suit different requirements, rendering it a flexible choice for solopreneurs, small enterprises, or larger corporations.
RecurPost stands out with its user-friendly interface, catering to users of all tech levels. It balances sophistication and accessibility for both experts and newcomers in social media marketing.
The consideration of cost-effectiveness is of the utmost significance, and RecurPost shows its recognition of this by providing competitive pricing plans. As a result, advanced social media management becomes accessible to users without imposing a heavy cost. The platform offers a great function for recycling material, which automates the process of resharing evergreen content. This feature optimizes time management by ensuring that your best content is consistently delivered to your audience.
RecurPost supports various platforms: Facebook, Twitter, LinkedIn, Instagram, enabling holistic social media management. In summary, RecurPost redefines the “Meetedgar vs Buffer” debate with its comprehensive solution. It offers a persuasive alternative that has the potential to reinvent and enhance one’s social media strategy.