Coschedule vs Buffer
Which To Pick in 2025?
Coschedule
The All-In-One AI Marketing Calendar For Content, Social, and Beyond
Coschedule
Coschedule, founded in 2013, started as a marketing calendar designed to help businesses and individuals stay organized. Over time, it has evolved into a comprehensive marketing suite, offering tools for social media scheduling, content organization, and project management.
The platform caters to marketers, content creators, and businesses that need an all-in-one solution for managing their marketing strategies. Its features include a powerful marketing calendar, which provides a centralized view of campaigns, deadlines, and publishing schedules, making it easier to stay on track.
CoSchedule’s advanced project management tools allow teams to assign tasks, set priorities, and monitor progress, fostering efficiency and accountability. Whether you’re managing a small team or handling a large campaign, CoSchedule simplifies workflows and helps deliver better results.
Buffer
Buffer, established in 2010, began as a straightforward scheduling tool for Twitter. Over the years, it has expanded into a multi-platform social media management tool, catering to a wide range of needs while maintaining its focus on simplicity and ease of use.
The platform is especially popular among small businesses, entrepreneurs, and social media managers looking for an intuitive and affordable way to schedule and publish posts. Its user-friendly interface makes it a great choice for individuals or teams new to social media management, helping them stay consistent without overwhelming complexity.
Buffer is also known for its transparency and commitment to supporting creators and small businesses. With features designed to streamline workflows and make social media more accessible, it continues to be a trusted tool for building and managing an online presence.
Overview
Choosing the right social media management tool is key for anyone looking to connect with their audience and grow their online presence. Whether you’re managing social media for a business, a personal brand, or a side project, the right tool can make scheduling easier, improve teamwork, and save valuable time.
This comparison of CoSchedule and Buffer will help you figure out which tool fits your social media needs best. By exploring their features, pricing, and ease of use, you’ll get a clearer idea of which option works for your goals.
If you’re managing multiple social media accounts, trying to schedule posts, track performance, and engage with your audience—all while handling other tasks—you’ve probably come across CoSchedule and Buffer. But which one has the features you need? Which fits your budget? And which offers the best support? Let’s break it down!
Coschedule vs Buffer: User Rating
| Rating Categories | Coschedule | Buffer |
| Star Rating (Out of 5) | 4.2 | 4.5 |
| Meets Requirements (Out of 10) | 8.5 | 8.9 |
| Ease of Use (Out of 10) | 8.3 | 9.0 |
| Ease of Setup (Out of 10) | 8.2 | 9.2 |
| Ease of Admin (Out of 10) | 8.0 | 8.8 |
| Quality of Support (Out of 10) | 8.4 | 9.1 |
| Business Partnership (Out of 10) | 8.0 | 8.2 |
| Product Direction (% positive) | 8.1 | 8.3 |
Coschedule:
Coschedule has received positive feedback on platforms like G2 and Capterra for its project management and marketing calendar features. Users often highlight its ability to streamline workflows and manage multiple campaigns. However, some reviews mention that the interface can be overwhelming for first-time users.
- G2 Rating: 4.4/5
- Capterra Rating: 4.4/5
Buffer:
Buffer is frequently praised for its simplicity and affordability, particularly on review sites like G2 and Capterra. Many users appreciate its clean design and ease of use, though others note the absence of a unified social inbox and restricted team management features.
- G2 Rating: 4.3/5
- Capterra Rating: 4.5/5
While Coschedule is praised for its robust marketing and collaboration features, it can be complex for beginners. Buffer, on the other hand, wins points for its simplicity and user-friendliness, though it may lack some advanced functionalities.
Agorapulse vs Buffer: Feature Comparison
| Features | Agorapulse | Buffer |
|---|---|---|
| Pricing (per month in USD) | $79 | $65 |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms Supported | Major platforms including Instagram, Facebook, Twitter | Major platforms including Instagram, Facebook, Twitter |
| Bulk Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| RSS Feeds | Yes | Yes |
| Recurring Posts | Yes | No |
| Social Inbox | Yes | No |
| AI Content Generation | No | No |
| Hashtag Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Caption Customization | Yes | No |
| AI Images | No | No |
| Advanced Analytics | Yes | Yes |
| White Label Reports | Yes | No |
| URL Shortener | Yes | Yes |
| Unlimited Workspaces | Yes | No |
| Team Management | Yes | Yes |
Features
Scheduling and Automation
- Coschedule: Offers advanced scheduling capabilities integrated with a marketing calendar, making it easier to coordinate social media posts with broader marketing campaigns. Automation tools allow users to streamline workflows and ensure consistent posting.
- Buffer: Focuses on simplicity with straightforward scheduling tools that allow users to queue posts for multiple platforms. It also offers automation for posting at optimal times based on audience engagement data.
Supported Social Media Platforms
- Coschedule: Supports major platforms like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Pinterest. It integrates seamlessly with tools like WordPress, making it ideal for content marketers managing blogs and social media.
- Buffer: Covers popular platforms including Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and Pinterest. It also offers Instagram direct publishing and integrations with third-party tools for extended functionality.
Analytics and Reporting
- Coschedule: Provides basic performance metrics for social media posts. Additional insights into team performance and campaign success are available for premium users.
- Buffer: Includes detailed analytics that highlight engagement metrics like clicks, likes, and shares. The paid plans offer in-depth reports, including audience demographics and performance trends.
User Interface and Experience
- Coschedule: Features a more robust interface designed for advanced project management, which may have a learning curve for new users. The marketing calendar layout is ideal for team collaboration but may feel overwhelming for individual users.
- Buffer: Known for its clean and user-friendly design. The intuitive layout makes it easy for users to schedule posts and view analytics without much prior experience.
Both tools offer strong scheduling and platform support, but Coschedule leans toward marketers managing multi-channel campaigns, while Buffer excels in ease of use for individuals and small teams focused on social media scheduling and engagement.
Pricing Comparison
Coschedule Pricing
Coschedule offers a range of plans tailored to meet the needs of individuals and teams:
- Free Calendar Plan: Designed for solo marketers or small teams, this plan includes essential features such as connecting up to two social profiles, scheduling up to 15 social posts at a time, and utilizing an AI Social Assistant for generating social messages.
- Pro Plan: Starts at $39 per user/month, offering access to the full Marketing Calendar, unlimited social media scheduling, and integrations with other tools.
- Marketing Suite: Custom pricing for larger teams requiring advanced collaboration, content management, and team performance tracking.
Buffer Pricing
Buffer provides flexible and affordable pricing plans, catering to individuals and small businesses:
- Free Plan: Includes basic scheduling for up to 3 social media accounts, making it a great option for individuals starting out.
- Essentials Plan: Priced at $6 per social account/month, this plan offers advanced scheduling, analytics, and engagement features.
- Team Plan: Starts at $12 per social account/month and includes enhanced collaboration tools for small teams.
Coschedule’s Free Calendar Plan is a useful option for individuals managing light workloads, but users seeking more flexibility may need to upgrade to paid plans.
Buffer’s free plan is slightly more accommodating for those managing multiple social accounts, while its affordable paid plans provide excellent value for growing businesses.
Pros and Cons of Using Coschedule
Pros
- Integrated Marketing Calendar: Ideal for coordinating social media posts with broader marketing campaigns and projects.
- AI Social Assistant: Helps users create optimized social messages quickly and efficiently.
- Project Management Features: Includes tools for team collaboration, task assignment, and campaign tracking, making it a great choice for marketing teams.
- Free Plan Availability: Provides a free calendar plan with essential features for individuals or small teams.
Cons
- Learning Curve: The robust interface can feel overwhelming for new users or individuals not managing large campaigns.
- Higher Costs for Advanced Features: Accessing premium functionalities like unlimited scheduling and advanced collaboration requires significant investment.
- Limited Social Inbox: Lacks a consolidated inbox for managing social media conversations directly within the platform.
Pros and Cons of Using Buffer
Pros
- User-Friendly Interface: Simple and intuitive design, making it easy for beginners to schedule and manage posts.
- Affordable Pricing: Offers flexible plans, including a free option, suitable for small businesses and individual users.
- Supports Multiple Platforms: Provides direct publishing to major social media channels, including Instagram, Facebook, and LinkedIn.
- AI Content Generation: Helps users create engaging posts with minimal effort, streamlining the content creation process.
Cons
- Limited Team Management Tools: Not as robust in handling complex team workflows or larger projects.
- No Unified Social Inbox: Does not provide tools for managing messages and comments directly from the platform.
- Basic Free Plan: The free version has limitations in the number of accounts and posts that can be managed.
Ideal Use Cases
Coschedule: Where It Excels
- Team Collaboration: Ideal for marketing teams managing complex campaigns and content calendars. Its project management features enable task assignment, collaboration, and timeline tracking, making it perfect for larger teams or agencies.
- Integrated Marketing Strategies: If you’re looking to align your social media efforts with broader marketing goals, Coschedule’s Marketing Calendar ensures seamless coordination of content across multiple platforms.
- Content Creators with High Workloads: With its AI Social Assistant and bulk scheduling, Coschedule is great for marketers who need to generate, optimize, and schedule high volumes of content efficiently.
Buffer: Where It Excels
- Small Businesses and Solo Entrepreneurs: Buffer’s affordability and simple interface make it a go-to for those managing social media on a budget without sacrificing essential scheduling features.
- New Social Media Managers: For individuals new to social media management, Buffer’s user-friendly design ensures a smooth learning experience.
- Content-Focused Strategies: If your primary focus is on scheduling and publishing posts consistently, Buffer’s straightforward scheduling tools and AI content generation features are ideal.
Coschedule’s advanced project management features make it the better choice for teams with a heavy marketing workload.
Buffer is more suitable for smaller-scale users who prioritize simplicity, affordability, and ease of use in their social media management.
