Agorapulse vs Hootsuite
Which Is Best in 2025?
Overview of Agorapulse
Founded in 2011 and headquartered in Paris, France, Agorapulse is a social media management platform designed to help businesses and agencies manage their social media presence. The company offers a suite of tools for scheduling posts, monitoring social channels, and analyzing performance metrics.
Best suite for:
Agorapulse is best suited for small to medium-sized businesses and marketing agencies seeking an intuitive platform to streamline their social media management processes.
Other Agorapulse Comparisons
Overview of Hootsuite
Established in 2008, Hootsuite originated from a digital marketing agency’s need for a comprehensive social media management tool. The platform has since evolved into a leading solution, offering a wide range of features for social media scheduling, monitoring, and analytics.
Best suite for:
Hootsuite caters to a diverse clientele, including small businesses, large enterprises, and marketing professionals.
Overview
The model management technique might give your business the competitive benefit it needs in a digital space where social media platforms predominate. Effective social media management is critical for organizations trying to stay competitive in the internet arena. This comparison will explore two famous social media management platforms: Agorapulse and Hootsuite.
RecurPost’s insight and knowledge will take you through a thorough analysis. That way, you can decide which platform best meets your brand’s social media needs. This comparison will provide vital information to help you optimize your social media strategy and increase your brand’s online visibility, whether you are an experienced marketer or a beginner in social media marketing.
Agorapulse vs. Hootsuite: User Rating
| Rating Categories | Agorapulse | Hootsuite |
| Star Rating (Out of 5) | 4.3 | 4.1 |
| Meets Requirements (Out of 10) | 8.5 | 8.4 |
| Ease of Use (Out of 10) | 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Ease of Setup (Out of 10) | 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Ease of Admin (Out of 10) | 9.1 | 8.5 |
| Quality of Support (Out of 10) | 9.2 | 8.0 |
| Business Partnership (Out of 10) | 9.1 | 8.4 |
| Product Direction (% positive) | 91 | 76 |
According to G2 user ratings, Agorapulse better meets business needs than Hootsuite. Users praised its responsive support and frequent feature updates that align with industry trends. For businesses seeking reliable assistance and innovative improvements, Agorapulse stands out as the preferred choice.
Feature Comparison
Choosing the right social media management tool can be tricky, especially when deciding between Agorapulse and Hootsuite. Here’s a side-by-side look at their features, pricing, and strengths to help you make the best choice for your business.
| Features | Agorapulse | Hootsuite |
| Pricing (per month in USD) | $79 | $149 |
| Free Trial | Yes | Yes |
| Platforms Supported | Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and more | Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, LinkedIn, and more |
| Bulk Scheduling | Yes | Yes |
| RSS feeds | Yes | No |
| Recurring Posts | No | No |
| Social Inbox | Yes | Yes |
| AI Content Generation | No | No |
| Hashtag Storage | Yes | Yes |
| Caption Customization | No | No |
| Advanced Analytics | Yes | No |
| White Label Reports | Yes | No |
a. Pricing Comparison
Agorapulse starts at $79/month, offering features like unlimited reports and a unified inbox. A free trial is also available. Hootsuite’s pricing begins at $149/month, with extra charges for advanced tools, making it the more expensive option.
b. Scheduling and Automation
Agorapulse simplifies scheduling with tools like bulk uploads, queuing, and content categorization. Its calendar provides a clear view of posts. Hootsuite allows scheduling across multiple platforms but lacks content categorization, which can make organizing harder for large teams.
c. Analytics & Reporting
Agorapulse stands out with unlimited, easy-to-read reports included in all plans. Hootsuite offers analytics, but they often come as add-ons and are less intuitive.
d. Team Collaboration
Agorapulse provides built-in collaboration tools for task assignments and approvals, even in basic plans. Hootsuite requires higher-tier plans for similar features, which may not be ideal for smaller teams.
e. Content Creation
Agorapulse excels in structured planning with its intuitive content calendar, making it easy to create and manage posts. Hootsuite shines in content curation and Canva integration, catering to more complex content needs.
f. Integrations
Both platforms integrate with major social networks like Facebook, Instagram, Twitter, and LinkedIn. Hootsuite offers more third-party integrations but often at additional costs.
g. Supported Social Media Platforms
Agorapulse supports key platforms like Facebook, Instagram, LinkedIn, Twitter, and YouTube. Hootsuite covers niche platforms but sometimes requires extra apps, complicating usability.
h. Social Listening
Agorapulse provides affordable, built-in social listening features. Hootsuite offers more advanced options, but they often rely on costly third-party integrations.
i. Social Inbox
Agorapulse simplifies communication with a unified inbox for all messages, comments, and mentions. Hootsuite lacks this feature, requiring users to manage messages in separate streams.
Pros and Cons of Using Agorapulse
Pros
- Comprehensive platform support
- Intuitive interface making navigation simpler
- Effective for team collaboration
Cons
- Lacks some advanced content customization options
Pros and Cons of Using Hootsuite
Pros
- Wide range of features and integrations
- Strong reputation in the industry
- Excellent for managing multiple social media accounts
Cons
- Pricier than some competitors
- The interface can be overwhelming for beginners
While Agorapulse and Hootsuite are powerful tools for social media management, it’s worth considering other alternatives that might align even more closely with your needs, such as RecurPost. With its unique features and pricing structure, RecurPost offers additional functionality that may better suit certain users, especially those looking for advanced automation and content recycling.